Social Security and the Flu
In this video which was released today, Social Security provides excellent suggestions on how seniors can protect themselves from the flu. In a nutshell: Take your flu shot and don’t visit Social Security.
David Kessler M.D.: You can protect yourself from the flu by taking a few simple steps. First, cover your month and nose when sneezing or coughing and encourage those around you to do the same. Next, wash your hands often with soap and water. And most importantly: get a flu shot.
Patty Duke: If you want to do business with Social Security, but don’t wanna visit an office, you can go online to socialsecurity.gov
David Kessler M.D.: Take some precautions during this flu season.
Patty Duke: Go online!
Social Security Field Representative Edward Sarkies on Social Security
Social Security is the most successful government program ever. It has been making payments since January of 1940. In the near future, some important changes will have to be made so the program can continue to provide Social Security benefits as usual. Watch this video for a few insightful comments made by a Social Security field representative. He discusses the future of Social Security and what action needs to take place for change.
Ed Sarkies: Hello, my name is Ed Sarkies. I work for the Social Security Administration. I’m a field representative at the local Kingston, New York Social Security office. One of the questions that were frequently asked at Social Security, and you know it’s an issue that’s before the public on an ongoing basis and that is, “Ïs Social Security going to be there for me when I’m ready to retire? I’m 55 years of age now and from what I read in the newspapers, Social Security is in desperate financial straits at the present time or in the near future, it’s possible that maybe there’s no money available for me when I reach age 62 or when I reach age 66? So what’s the story on that topic?”
Well, I can start here and say that Social Security in a historical sense has existed making payments since January of 1940. It was passed into law in 1935. It started payments in January of 1940 and it has not missed any payments since that date to the present time. So it’s a program of long longevity. It’s probably the most successful government program that’s ever been in existence. To make payments from 1940 to the present without missing a payment shows a substantial significant successful program. The government is not going to let Social Security flounder financially.
Changes definitely have to be made with Social Security. In fact, the financial outlook for Social Security if no changes are made in the way Social Security payments are presently being sent out, that is if no legislative changes are made, Social Security is going to not be able to pay all its beneficiaries by the year 2037. At that point, what will happen if no legislative changes are made, if no changes are made in the Social Security System, only 75 percent of the people receiving Social Security benefits will be able to receive their benefits. There is going to be a shortcoming or shortfall of about 25 percent at that time.
So, of course, the system can’t work. It can’t continue to exist if that dire outlook exists. But what’s going to have to happen is there is going to have to be a consensus, a political consensus, to make the important changes in Social Security.
What those changes may be? I don’t know, but it’s going to be basic things like either reduction in the amount of the Social Security benefit payments, changes into who these benefits are payable to, or on the other side of the coin, an increase in the amount of the Social Security taxes. Whatever it may be, Social Security is going to need some changes. It’s going to need some legislative attention soon, and so at that point, when these changes, these necessary changes are made, Social Security, I’m sure, will continue on as it has been since 1940, again, being the most successful government program that’s ever existed.
How To Claim Your $250 Stimulus Check… Not!
Will Obama make us jump through the hoops to get our $250 stimulus checks in 2010? Watch the clip below for the Late Show’s take on the issue. (Sadly, some people haven’t even received their 2009 stimulus checks yet.)
Bret Baier: We told you last week that there will be no cost of living increase next year for more than 50 million Social Security recipients because of an absence of inflation, but the Obama administration wants to send seniors a check for $250 anyway. Well, apparently, the rules of how to actually get that check have just come out.
Voice: In these tough times, President Obama is pleased to offer America’s seniors $250 bonus. To receive your money, simply go to 250bonus.gov and print out the six-page form. Upon completion of the form, hand-deliver it to Social Security headquarters in Washington, Room 740 7th Floor. Sorry, no elevator access. You’ll be given a unique 17-digit code, which you enter at the US Treasury’s toll-free number when you hear the prompt. Please listen carefully as the 24 menu options have recently changed. You’ll receive Form SP-250 within 6 to 8 weeks. Complete the form, have it countersigned by your local postmaster, then just scan it, convert it to a PDF file and send it as an email attachment to your nearest Federal Reserve Bank. That’s all there is to it.
Bret Baier: Thanks for inviting us into your home tonight. That’s it for Special Report; fair, balanced and unafraid.
Pump Up Your Social Security
A few days ago, CNBC’s Sharon Epperson shared her helpful advice on how to maximize your Social Security benefits.
Reporter: This morning on today’s Fountain of Youth: Maximizing Social Security Payouts. More than 52 million Americans who draw Social Security will not see a cost of living increase next year. But according to US News and World Report’ Fall Money Issue, there are ways to pump up your benefits. Sharon Epperson is the MSNBC’s personal finance correspondence. Sharon, good morning.
Sharon Epperson: Good morning.
Reporter: First, before we get to the ways to pump up your benefits, let’s talk about why no cost of living increase this year.
Sharon: No cost of living increases because it’s tied to consumer prices and consumer prices have been going down. This is the first time that there’s not going to be a cost of living increase since 1975. But President Obama is trying to urge Congress to have a $250 one-time fee paid to retirees.
Reporter: To compensate for that.
Sharon: To compensate for that, but there’s a lot of debate.
Reporter: But that may or may not pass.
Sharon: It may or may not pass.
Reporter: Okay, so let’s talk about what we need to do, then we’ll know what we need to do in terms of pumping up our benefits. You talk about delay claiming benefits and we’ve got a graphics here to tell you why it’s so important. Read more
No Social Security Benefit Increase In 2010
For the first time in 30 years, Social Security recipients in the United States will not receive an annual adjustment in benefits. More than 52 million older Americans depend on Social Security for all or part of their retirement income. As pension funds and the stock market have declined in the last decade, Social Security has become the primary – rather than supplemental – income for many retirees. VOA’s Jeff Swicord introduces us to one Social Security recipient who is trying to stay afloat.
Mike Kilburn on Social Security
Mike Kilburn, a Warren County Commissioner who is ready to challenge Jean Schmidt (R-OH) for her seat in Congress, recorded the following video on Social Security:
Mike Kilburn: A much bigger problem than healthcare in this country is the financial stability of our Social Security program. Social Security is the program that needs to change. We need to look at the retirement age. We need to look at how we fund Social Security. You know, you only pay Social Security premiums on the first $100,000. You know, anyone making over $100,000 doesn’t pay any premium on that last end of their salary. So if we would revise that, I’m sure we could put Social Security back on a good footing. But we’ve got to get on top of it or people aren’t going to get those benefits they worked so hard and expected to have when they retire.
2010 Social Security COLA Poll
It’s official: There will be no COLA in 2010, even though costs of living have been going up for most seniors. Should the government pay Social Security recipients a $250 COLA replacement, and if so, how should they pay for it?
Loading ...Is the 2010 COLA just a government bribe for seniors on Social Security?
Next year, for the first time ever, social security recipients will not receive a cost of living adjustment in their payments. Instead, Barack Obama is proposing a one-time $250 payment right before next fall’s midterm elections. Gerald Celente says that the cost of living really hasn’t decreased, the government is basing their measurements on a decreasing standard of living and the payout is just to keep people quiet.
Bill: Joining us for more on this is Dina. So does the government have anything left now to sweeten the pill for those on Social Security?
Dina Gusovsky: Indeed they do. Now millions of Social Security recipients, as you said, will not see an increase in their monthly payments next year, because the cost of living has decreased. But, the federal government says it’s going to give them a onetime payment of $250, which of course will cost the government billions of dollars, considering how many seniors there are. So, is this really warranted, and how much is it going to contribute to the national debt?
Well, joining me is Gerald Celente from the Trends Research Institute. Mr. Celente, thank you so much for speaking to me. So, help me understand this – if the cost of living is decreasing, then why are seniors getting anything at all?
Gerald Celente: Well, first of all, the cost of living isn’t decreasing. What they are doing in Washington is the same thing they do on Wall Street. They cook the book. What they’ve done is they’ve cooked the cost of living. For example, one time it used to be a fixed basket of goods. Now it’s a variable basket of goods. So let’s say that the price of gasoline goes up, they say, “Oh, no no. It really didn’t go up. The quality of air went up, so therefore, the cost of gasoline went down.” They’re doing everything they can to shortchange the people. So it’s going to cost the government 13 billion dollars to give the people a couple of bucks that they will hardly feel at all.
Dina Gusvsky: Well, that’s another thing I wanted to ask you. Where did they come off with this figure? What’s $250 going to do?
Geralnd Celente: Well, they’re just making something up, just like they make up the numbers. These numbers have nothing to do with reality. The reality is that what they’re measuring now is a declining standard of living. So let’s say at one time they measured you going into a retail store and buying some clothes. Now they’re going to measure you going into a discount store, or a dollar store, to buy your goods and services. They didn’t even take into account the rising prices of housing. The way they measure it is, “How much can you rent your house for? Even though, let’s say, you are paying $4,000 a month for that mortgage, you can only rent it for $1,500, so therefore the cost didn’t go up, it went down.” They’re cooking the books just like they do on Wall Street.
Dina Gusvsky: So is this essentially a political move, because these payments are going to be issued just before the mid-term elections. Is this kind of a bribe, would you say, because politicians rely on seniors to vote?
Gerald Celente: Of course it is. The people are seething from the tens of billions of dollars that executives are getting in pay, and the Wall Street bonuses that were given to them, via the people, through the bailout programs. So they’re throwing the people a couple of crumbs to keep them quiet and to say, “Hey, we’re in your corner and we’re doing the best we can to help you”. It’s political jive talk.
Dina Gusvsky: Is this a second stimulus then? Because the government has been very careful about how it words this. What do you think?
Gerald Celente: Well, it’s not a stimulus. But what it is doing is that the effect is the same. Follow the dollar and follow gold prices. Gold prices are hitting historic highs. The dollar is now worth 16% on year, and what it is doing is it is devaluing the dollar and a continuation of very, very irresponsible Federal Reserve policies. It’s just building up more debt, that’s all it’s doing.
Dina Gusvsky: Well, speaking about that, how does Barack Obama plan to finance this? He hasn’t been clear on that, either.
Gerald Celente: Same way they finance everything, by just selling more debt. They’re monetizing debt, and so that’s all we’re seeing, again. The results can be seen on the markets. Current events form future trends. You know, they’re talking about the DOW hitting 10,000. Well, the DOW first hit 10,000 ten years ago. Since that time, the dollar has lost 36% against the Swiss franc and the euro. Ten years ago an ounce of gold was selling at $280/ounce, not $1,050/ounce as it is today. And ten years ago, a barrel of oil was going for under $17, not nearly $77 a barrel. So you can see what they’re doing; devaluing the dollar. The cost of living index is really just chasing America’s lowering standards of living.
Dina Gusvsky: That’s a very interesting point, Mr. Celente. I want to thank you for your analysis, as always. And right now I’m going to throw it back to you in Moscow, Bill. But we will be here in just one hour bringing you another live up-to-date report.
Bill: Thanks very much indeed, Dina. And as Dina says…
Seniors Need a $250 COLA in 2010
The National Committee To Preserve Social Security and Medicare delivered 120,000 petitions to Congress saying “Seniors Need A COLA”.
Senator Bernie Sanders: On October 15th, it is expected that social security administration will announce for the first time in 35 years that seniors will not receive a COLA. Based on the formula, that by law they are obliged to use, they came to the conclusion that there is no inflation this year for seniors, and in fact their understanding is that prices for seniors have declined.
In my view, that is a wrong formulation. And I believe that it simply does not accurately reflect the purchasing habits of seniors. Seniors right now – I know this will come as a great shock – are not rushing out to discount stores to buy laptops, computers or iPods. What seniors now are purchasing, what they need, is health care prescription drugs. And the evidence is overwhelming that seniors spend a disproportionate percentage of their limited incomes on health care and prescription drug needs. And those costs, sadly, are not declining. They are, in fact, going up.
Rep. Peter DeFazio: As Senator Sanders noted earlier, a much more accurate measurement of the poverty level for seniors would show that it’s twice what we measure it at. We don’t have a good measure of what the inflation rate is for seniors. But we do know that pharmaceutical costs continue to escalate, medical care costs continue to escalate. Their rents or mortgages haven’t gone down. Their utilities have likely gone up. You know, nothing else that they have to consume has gone down in price over the last year. So, this modest $250 one-time payment to seniors would be basically equivalent to a 2% cost of living adjustment. It would help them meet some of those bare necessity costs.
Barbara B. Kennelly: And I am here today to deliver a 120,000 petitions saying “Hey, guess what? We need a COLA! Guess what, we’ve got some problems! We are the seniors of the United States. We are the seniors that built this county to be the country it is.” And I’m so delighted that these gentlemen are right behind that.
Let me give you the facts – 43% increase in Part A since 2000, 50% increase in Part B since 2000. Part D – now listen to this – Part D has a 130% increase. Those are prescription drugs.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: In Rhode Island, our seniors have a bigger proportion of their income come from social security than almost any other state. And we have seen, with real impact, what the other speakers have described. Which is – seniors seeing electric utility rates go up, seniors seeing pharmaceutical costs go up, seniors seeing all the real costs of their living go up. And with no real help in sight.
Senator Bob Casey: The least that we should do in the midst of the terrible recession, for older citizens and for families all across the country, is to make sure that we can provide some measure of relief that this legislation provides. That’s why we support it, no matter when it would come up, but especially in the midst of this economic darkness that so many families, so many older citizens have had to endure.
Rep. Maurice Hinchey: A failure to provide a Social Security COLA in 2010 for seniors would be a very critical mistake and have a very negative impact on them. And also, given the economic circumstances our country has faced over the course of this past year – actually, over the course of past two years – this economic downturn has pushed a decline in the standard of living of many seniors. Many have seen their home values drop, their pension funds severely decline, and their savings, in many instances, undermined and disappearing.
Estelle Lenet: My name is Esther Lenette and I am a resident of Montgomery county, Maryland. I’m 91 years old, and blessed to still be living independently. My only source of income is Social Security and I want to say that without Social Security, I don’t know where I’d be today. I really don’t. Getting a COLA next year doesn’t mean I’m going to be able to live extravagantly, but it means that I can keep up with my financial responsibilities and pay for the basics, especially the medical care that helps me stay independent. My thanks to the members of Congress for working to pass a COLA for seniors. Thank you!
Social Security Confirms: No COLA in 2010!
Prompt Passage of Economic Recovery Act Payment for 2010 Needed
Law Does Not Provide for a Social Security Cost-of-Living Adjustment for 2010
With consumer prices down over the past year, monthly Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits for more than 57 million Americans will not automatically increase in 2010. This will be the first year without an automatic Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) since they went into effect in 1975.
“Social Security is doing its job helping Americans maintain their standard of living,” Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security said. “Last year when consumer prices spiked, largely as a result of higher gas prices, beneficiaries received a 5.8 percent COLA, the largest increase since 1982. This year, in light of the human need, we need to support President Obama’s call for us to make another $250 recovery payment for 57 million Americans.”
The Social Security Act provides that Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits increase automatically each year if there is an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the third quarter of the last year to the third quarter of the current year. This year there was no increase in the CPI-W from the third quarter of 2008 to the third quarter of 2009. In addition, because there was no increase in the CPI-W this year, under the law the starting point for determinations regarding a possible 2011 COLA will remain the third quarter of 2008.
Some other changes that would normally take effect in January 2010 based on the increase in average wages also will not take effect, even though average wages did increase. Since there is no COLA, the statute prohibits an increase in the maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax as well as the retirement earnings test exempt amounts. These amounts will remain unchanged in 2010. The attached fact sheet provides more information on 2010 Social Security changes.
Information about Medicare changes for 2010, when available, will be found at www.Medicare.gov. The Department of Health and Human Services has not yet announced if there will be any Medicare premium changes for 2010. Should there be an increase in the Medicare Part B premium, the law contains a “hold harmless” provision that protects about 93 percent of Social Security beneficiaries from paying a higher Part B premium, in order to avoid reducing their net Social Security benefit. Those not protected include higher income beneficiaries subject to an income-adjusted Part B premium and beneficiaries newly entitled to Part B in 2010. On September 24th, the House passed legislation by 406-18 that would, on a fully paid-for basis, prevent abnormally large premium increases. The President is calling on the Senate to enact this legislation before it becomes too late for the Social Security Administration to update its computer systems to implement this needed change.
For additional information about the 2010 COLA, go to www.socialsecurity.gov/cola.
Settle Tax Debt Fast!
Get Foreclosure Help
