<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case For Not Privatizing Social Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ss.com/2009/the-case-for-not-privatizing-social-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ss.com/2009/the-case-for-not-privatizing-social-security/</link>
	<description>Social Security &#38; Retirement Information and Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:45:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.ss.com/2009/the-case-for-not-privatizing-social-security/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ss.com/?p=243#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>Abolish SS ??   I think not.  There are so many elderly folks getting SS as their one income - what would happen to them - and the disabled that can&#039;t work and the mentally impaired folks - and the Medicare that all these people get would be lost - how would they get to see doctors or go in the hospital.  No insurance company would insure them or if they did the premiums would be sky high.

I agree SS should not be gambled with - but your solution is just as bad.  Now SSI comes directly from taxpayers money as does medicaid - thousands of people live together and get those benefits as they don&#039;t notify the proper authorities that their income is now combined - Thousands get their medicine from medicaid and sell them on the street.

Now which should be abolished??

SSI - a form of welfare OR

SS - an insurance that workers paid into and were promised a retirement income in their older years or if they got hurt and could not work anymore..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abolish <a href="http://www.ss.com" >SS</a> ??   I think not.  There are so many elderly folks getting <a href="http://www.ss.com" >SS</a> as their one income &#8211; what would happen to them &#8211; and the disabled that can&#8217;t work and the mentally impaired folks &#8211; and the Medicare that all these people get would be lost &#8211; how would they get to see doctors or go in the hospital.  No insurance company would insure them or if they did the premiums would be sky high.</p>
<p>I agree SS should not be gambled with &#8211; but your solution is just as bad.  Now SSI comes directly from taxpayers money as does medicaid &#8211; thousands of people live together and get those benefits as they don&#8217;t notify the proper authorities that their income is now combined &#8211; Thousands get their medicine from medicaid and sell them on the street.</p>
<p>Now which should be abolished??</p>
<p>SSI &#8211; a form of welfare OR</p>
<p>SS &#8211; an insurance that workers paid into and were promised a retirement income in their older years or if they got hurt and could not work anymore..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
